Assessment of the safety and efficacy of the Zoom 45 and 55 reperfusion catheters for medium and distal mechanical thrombectomies: A multi-institutional study.

INTRODUCTION: The Zoom aspiration catheters harbor novel dimensions and construction to enhance trackability and deliverability. In addition, a beveled tip may improve thrombus interaction and aspiration force for a set inner diameter. This study evaluates their utility in medium and distal vessel occlusions. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and efficacy of Zoom 45 and 55 aspiration catheters in medium and distal vessel thrombectomy. METHODS: Patients treated for distal vessel occlusions via mechanical thrombectomy utilizing either the Zoom 45/55 catheter or a historical control catheter between 2021-2022 at two institutions were included in this study. Medium and distal occlusions were defined as any anterior or posterior cerebral artery branch as well as the M2-4 segment of the middle cerebral artery (MCA). Preprocedural, procedural, and postprocedural variables were obtained. RESULTS: Thirty-eight patients underwent thrombectomy with Zoom 45 or 55 catheters; four had multiple occluded vessels. Occlusion location included the M2 in 32 cases, M3-4 in 7 cases, A2 in 2 cases and P2 in 1 case. The mean number of passes per occlusion was 1.6 and overall successful reperfusion (TICI 2b or greater) was achieved in 84 % of cases. There were no symptomatic procedure-related complications such as perforation or post-procedural symptomatic ICH. Modified Rankin scores rates of 0-2, 3-5, and 6 at three months post-procedure were 35.7 %, 21.4 %, and 42.9 %, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: The Zoom beveled tip aspiration catheters are safe and effective for more challenging medium and distal vessel occlusions.

RapidpulseTM cyclic aspiration system for acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusions.

BACKGROUND: The best strategy to achieve optimal reperfusion outcomes during mechanical thrombectomy remains to be defined. The RapidPulseTM Cyclic Aspiration System is a novel technology, delivering high-frequency pulsed vacuum forces to increase the efficiency of aspiration thrombectomy. METHODS: Prospective, multicenter, open-label, core lab-adjudicated, two-arm study comparing safety and efficacy of a feasibility version of the RapidPulseTM system compared with contemporary controls. Primary endpoint was the rate of mTICI ≥ 2c after first-pass effect (FPE). Additional efficacy endpoints were the rates of mTICI ≥ 2b after first pass (modified FPE (mFPE)), last pass with study device defined as frontline technical success, and after all passes including rescue therapy. The primary safety endpoints included symptomatic ICH (sICH) within 24 h post-procedure. RESULTS: Between February 2022 to December 2022, 80 subjects were consented and enrolled in the study (n = 40 treatment arm, n = 40 control arm). In the intent to treat (ITT) population, mean age was 67.8 ± 11.5 years; 19 (47.5%) were male. Median NIHSS score was 16 (IQR: 13-22). Median ASPECTS score was 9 (IQR: 8-10). The rate of mTICI ≥ 2c after first pass was 53.9% in ITT population (60.0% in per-protocol population) versus 38.5% in the corresponding control population. Functional independence (mRS 0-2) at 90 days was achieved in 61.1% (22/36) in the RapidPulseTM arm and 52.8% (19/36) in the control arm. In the RapidPulseTM arm, no sICH within 24 h and no device-related morbidity or mortality occurred. CONCLUSION: Preliminary data suggests RapidPulseTM Aspiration System is highly effective and safe for recanalization of large vessel occlusions.

Early technique switch following failed passes during mechanical thrombectomy for ischemic stroke: should the approach change and when?

BACKGROUND: Fast and complete reperfusion in endovascular therapy (EVT) for ischemic stroke leads to superior clinical outcomes. The effect of changing the technical approach following initially unsuccessful passes remains undetermined. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the association between early changes to the EVT approach and reperfusion. METHODS: Multicenter retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data for patients who underwent EVT for intracranial internal carotid artery, middle cerebral artery (M1/M2), or basilar artery occlusions. Changes in EVT technique after one or two failed passes with stent retriever (SR), contact aspiration (CA), or a combined technique (CT) were compared with repeating the previous strategy. The primary outcome was complete/near-complete reperfusion, defined as an expanded Thrombolysis in Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) of 2c-3, following the second and third passes. RESULTS: Among 2968 included patients, median age was 66 years and 52% were men. Changing from SR to CA on the second or third pass was not observed to influence the rates of eTICI 2c-3, whereas changing from SR to CT after two failed passes was associated with higher chances of eTICI 2c-3 (OR=5.3, 95% CI 1.9 to 14.6). Changing from CA to CT was associated with higher eTICI 2c-3 chances after one (OR=2.9, 95% CI 1.6 to 5.5) or two (OR=2.7, 95% CI 1.0 to 7.4) failed CA passes, while switching to SR was not significantly associated with reperfusion. Following one or two failed CT passes, switching to SR was not associated with different reperfusion rates, but changing to CA after two failed CT passes was associated with lower chances of eTICI 2c-3 (OR=0.3, 95% CI 0.1 to 0.9). Rates of functional independence were similar. CONCLUSIONS: Early changes in EVT strategies were associated with higher reperfusion and should be contemplated following failed attempts with stand-alone CA or SR.

Remote Ischemic Conditioning With Medical Management or Reperfusion Therapy for Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Remote ischemic conditioning (RIC) is a low-cost, accessible, and noninvasive neuroprotective treatment strategy, but its efficacy and safety in acute ischemic stroke are controversial. With the publication of several randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and the recent results of the RESIST trial, it may be possible to identify the patient population that may (or may not) benefit from RIC. This systematic review and meta-analysis aims to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of RIC in patients with ischemic stroke receiving different treatments by pooling data of all randomized controlled studies to date. METHODS: We searched the PubMed, Embase, Cochrane, Elsevier, and Web of Science databases to obtain articles in all languages from inception until May 25, 2023. The primary outcome was the modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score at the specified endpoint time in the trial. The secondary outcomes were change in NIH Stroke Scale (NIHSS) and recurrence of stroke events. The safety outcomes were cardiovascular events, cerebral hemorrhage, and mortality. The quality of articles was evaluated through the Cochrane risk assessment tool. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023430073). RESULTS: There were 7,657 patients from 22 RCTs included. Compared with the control group, patients who received RIC did not have improved mRS functional outcomes, regardless of whether they received medical management, reperfusion therapy with intravenous thrombolysis (IVT), or mechanical thrombectomy (MT). In the medical management group, patients who received RIC had decreased incidence of stroke recurrence (risk ratio 0.63, 95% CI 0.43-0.92, p = 0.02) and lower follow-up NIHSS score by 1.72 points compared with the control group (p < 0.00001). There was no increased risk of adverse events including death or cerebral hemorrhage in the IVT or medical management group. DISCUSSION: In patients with ischemic stroke who are not eligible for reperfusion therapy, RIC did not affect mRS functional outcomes but significantly improved the NIHSS score at the follow-up endpoint and reduced stroke recurrence, without increasing the risk of cerebral hemorrhage or death. In patients who received IVT or MT, the benefit of RIC was not observed.

Intraoperative neuromonitoring as real-time diagnostic for cerebral ischemia in endovascular treatment of ruptured brain aneurysms.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the diagnostic accuracy of intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring (IONM) during endovascular treatment (EVT) of ruptured intracranial aneurysms (rIA). METHODS: IONM and clinical data from 323 patients who underwent EVT for rIA from 2014-2019 were retrospectively reviewed. Significant IONM changes and outcomes were evaluated based on visual review of data and clinical documentation. RESULTS: Of the 323 patients undergoing EVT, significant IONM changes were noted in 30 patients (9.29%) and 46 (14.24%) experienced postprocedural neurological deficits (PPND). 22 out of 30 (73.33%) patients who had significant IONM changes experienced PPND. Univariable analysis showed changes in somatosensory evoked potential (SSEP) and electroencephalogram (EEG) were associated with PPND (p-values: <0.001 and <0.001, retrospectively). Multivariable analysis showed that IONM changes were significantly associated with PPND (Odd ratio (OR) 20.18 (95%CI:7.40-55.03, p-value: <0.001)). Simultaneous changes in both IONM modalities had specificity of 98.9% (95% CI: 97.1%-99.7%). While sensitivity when either modality had a change was 47.8% (95% CI: 33.9%-62.0%) to predict PPND. CONCLUSIONS: Significant IONM changes during EVT for rIA are associated with an increased risk of PPND. SIGNIFICANCE: IONM can be used confidently as a real time neurophysiological diagnostic guide for impending neurological deficits during EVT treatment of rIA.

Intravenous Tirofiban Versus Alteplase Before Endovascular Treatment in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pooled Analysis of the DEVT and RESCUE BT Trials.

BACKGROUND: The present study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of intravenous tirofiban versus alteplase before endovascular treatment (EVT) in acute ischemic stroke patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion. METHODS: This was a post hoc analysis using data from 2 multicenter, randomized trials: the DEVT trial (Direct Endovascular Treatment for Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke) from May 2018 to May 2020 and the RESCUE BT trial (Intravenous Tirofiban Before Endovascular Thrombectomy for Acute Ischemic Stroke) from October 2018 to October 2021. Patients with acute intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours from last known well were dichotomized into 2 groups: tirofiban plus EVT versus alteplase bridging with EVT. The primary outcome was functional independence (modified Rankin Scale score of 0-2) at 90 days. Safety outcomes included symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage and 3-month mortality. Multivariable logistic regression (adjusting for baseline systolic blood pressure, occlusion site, onset-to-puncture time, anesthesia, and first choice of EVT) and propensity score overlap weighting (balance in demographic covariates, stroke characteristics, and initial management between groups) were performed. RESULTS: One-hundred and eighteen alteplase-treated patients in the DEVT trial and 98 tirofiban-treated patients in the RESCUE BT trial were included (median age, 70 years; 115 [53.2%] men). The rate of functional independence was 60.2% in the tirofiban group compared with 46.6% in the alteplase group (adjusted odds ratio, 1.25 [95% CI, 0.60-2.63]). Compared with alteplase, tirofiban was not associated with increased risk of symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (6.8% versus 9.2%; P=0.51) and mortality (17.8% versus 19.4%; P=0.76). The propensity score overlap weighting analyses showed consistent outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with intracranial large vessel occlusion within 4.5 hours of onset, tirofiban plus EVT was comparable to alteplase bridging with EVT regarding the efficacy and safety outcomes. These findings should be interpreted as preliminary and require confirmation in a randomized trial. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.chictr.org.cn; Unique identifiers: ChiCTR-IOR-17013568 and ChiCTR-INR-17014167.

Adjunct Intraarterial or Intravenous Tirofiban Versus No Tirofiban After Successful Recanalization of Basilar Artery Occlusion Stroke: The BASILAR Registry.

BACKGROUND: Approximately half of patients who achieve successful reperfusion do not achieve functional independence. The present study sought to investigate the clinical outcomes and safety of intraarterial or intravenous tirofiban as adjunct therapy in patients with acute basilar artery occlusion who had achieved successful recanalization with endovascular treatment. METHODS AND RESULTS: In the national, prospective BASILAR (Endovascular Treatment for Acute Basilar Artery Occlusion Study) registry, 458 patients who met inclusion criteria were divided into 3 groups based on tirofiban administration (no tirofiban, n=262; intravenous tirofiban, n=101; intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban, n=95). Their clinical outcomes were compared with 90-day modified Rankin Scale scores. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) and 95% CIs were obtained by logistic regression models and propensity score matching. Safety outcomes included any intracranial hemorrhage (ICH), symptomatic ICH, and mortality. Among 458 included patients, 184 (40.2%) achieved a favorable outcome (modified Rankin Scale score 0-3). There were no differences between the intravenous tirofiban group and the no tirofiban group in terms of safety and clinical outcomes (all P>0.05). Compared with the no tirofiban group, the intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban group had higher odds of 90-day modified Rankin Scale score 0 to 3 (aOR, 2.44 [95% CI, 1.30-4.64], P=0.006) and lower 3-month mortality (aOR, 0.38 [95% CI, 0.19-0.71], P=0.002) without an increase in any ICH (aOR, 0.34 [95% CI, 0.09-1.01], P=0.07) or symptomatic ICH (aOR, 0.23 [95% CI, 0.03-0.90], P=0.05). Similar results of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban on improving clinical outcomes were detected in novel cohorts constructed by propensity score matching. CONCLUSIONS: Intraarterial+intravenous rather than intravenous tirofiban improved clinical outcomes without increasing the frequency of symptomatic ICH among patients with basilar artery occlusion after successful endovascular treatment. Further studies are needed to delineate the roles of intraarterial+intravenous tirofiban in patients with basilar artery occlusion receiving endovascular treatment.

Competitive leptomeningeal flow impact on thrombectomy reperfusion grade rating.

BACKGROUND: Competitive leptomeningeal flow (CLF) can be observed immediately after mechanical thrombectomy (MT) reperfusion with retrograde contrast clearing of the distal leptomeningeal branches from non-contrast opacified flow through different vascular territories. We aim to evaluate the frequency of the CLF phenomenon, to determine if it has an association with the degree of leptomeningeal collateral status, and to understand the potentia impact it may have on the final expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) score rating. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of a prospective MT database spanning November 2020 to December 2021. Consecutive cases of intracranial internal carotid (i-ICA) or middle cerebral artery (MCA) M1 occlusions were included. CLF was defined by the observation of retrograde clearing of distal MCA branches that were previously opacified by antegrade reperfusion. The clearance of the distal branches is presumed to occur due to CLF via non-contrast opacified posterior cerebral artery or anterior cerebral artery flow. The washout was considered CLF if it cleared abruptly with or without forward reconstitution of antegrade opacification. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients met the inclusion criteria. The median age was 64 years (IQR 52.5-75) and 64 (51%) were men. The baseline median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score was 17 (IQR 12-22) and the Alberta Stroke Program Early CT Score was 9 (IQR 8-10). Median last known well time to puncture was 7 hours (IQR 4-13.1) and 30.4% received tissue plasminogen activator. Final eTICI 2c-3 was achieved in 80%. CLF was present in 32 (25.6%) patients, who had comparable baseline characteristics to patients without CLF. Twelve (37.5%) patients had regional CLF and 20 (62.5%) had focal CLF. The CLF arm had better leptomeningeal single-phase CTA collaterals than the non-CLF arm (P=0.01). The inter-rater agreement for the eTICI score was moderate when CLF was present and strong in its absence (Krippendorf's alpha=0.65 and 0.81, respectively). There was minimal agreement (Kappa=0.3) for the presence versus absence of CLF between the two operators, possibly related to reader experience. CONCLUSION: CLF was observed in 32% of patients, was associated with better collateral flow, and impacted the reported procedural eTICI rating.

Thrombectomy With the pRESET vs Solitaire Stent Retrievers as First-Line Large Vessel Occlusion Stroke Treatment: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Importance: Stent retriever-based thrombectomy is highly beneficial in large vessel occlusion (LVO) strokes. Many stent retriever designs are currently available, but comparison of these technologies in well-conducted studies is lacking. Objective: To determine whether thrombectomy for LVO stroke with the pRESET stent retriever is noninferior to treatment with the Solitaire stent retriever. Design, Setting, and Participants: This study was a multicenter, prospective, randomized, controlled, open-label, adaptive, noninferiority trial with blinded primary end point evaluation. Between October 2019 and February 2022, multicenter participation occurred across 19 research hospitals and/or universities in the US and 5 in Germany. Patients with LVO stroke were enrolled and included up to 8 hours after symptom onset. Interventions: Patients underwent 1:1 randomization to thrombectomy with the pRESET or Solitaire stent retriever. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was the difference in the rate of 90-day functional independence across the 2 devices, using a -12.5% noninferiority margin for the lower bound of the 1-sided 95% CI of the difference between pRESET and Solitaire retrievers. Results: Of 340 randomized patients, 170 (50.0%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 73.0 (64.0-82.0) years. The study procedure was completed in 322 of the 340 randomized patients. The primary end point of 90-day functional independence was achieved by 95 patients (54.9%; 95% CI, 48.7-61.1) in the pRESET group and in 96 (57.5%; 95% CI, 51.2-63.8) in the Solitaire group (absolute difference, -2.57%; 95% CI, -11.42 to 6.28). As the lower bound of the 95% CI was greater than -12.5%, the pRESET retriever was deemed noninferior to the Solitaire retriever. The noninferiority of pRESET over Solitaire was also observed in the secondary clinical end point (90-day shift in modified Rankin Scale score) and in both angiographic end points (Expanded Treatment in Cerebral Infarction [eTICI] score of 2b50 or greater within 3 passes: 146 of 173 [84.4%] vs 149 of 167 [89.2%]; absolute difference, -4.83%; 95% CI, -10.84 to 1.19; eTICI of 2c or greater following the first pass: 76 of 173 [43.7%] vs 74 of 167 [44.3%]; absolute difference, -0.63%; 95% CI, -9.48 to 8.21). Symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage occurred in 0 patients in the pRESET group and 2 (1.2%) in the Solitaire group. Mortality occurred in 25 (14.5%) in the pRESET group and in 24 (14.4%) in the Solitaire group at 90 days. Findings of the per-protocol and as-treated analyses were in concordance with findings of the intention-to-treat analysis. Conclusions and Relevance: In this study, among patients with LVO stroke, thrombectomy with the pRESET stent retriever was noninferior to thrombectomy with the Solitaire stent retriever. Findings suggest that pRESET offers a safe and effective option for flow restoration and disability reduction in patients with LVO stroke.

Cost-benefit analysis of intraoperative neuromonitoring for cardiac surgery.

BACKGROUND: Intraoperative neuromonitoring (IONM) can detect large vessel occlusion (LVO) in real-time during surgery. The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-benefit analysis of utilizing IONM among patients undergoing cardiac surgery. METHODS: A decision-analysis tree with terminal Markov nodes was constructed to model functional outcome, as measured via the modified Rankin Scale (mRS), among 65-year-old patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Our cost-benefit analysis compares the use of IONM (electroencephalography and somatosensory evoked potential) against no IONM in preventing neurological complications from perioperative LVO during cardiac surgery. The study was performed over a lifetime horizon from a societal perspective in the United States. Base case and one-way probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: At a baseline LVO rate of 0.31%, the mean attributable lifetime expenditure for IONM-monitored cardiac surgeries relative to unmonitored cardiac surgeries was $1047.41 (95% CI, $742.12 - $1445.10). At a critical LVO rate of approximately 3.67%, the costs of both monitored and unmonitored cardiac surgeries were the same. Above this critical rate, implementing IONM became cost-saving. On one-way sensitivity analysis, variation in LVO rate from 0% - 10% caused lifetime costs attributable to receiving IONM to range from $1150.47 - $29404.61; variations in IONM cost, percentage of intervenable LVOs, IONM sensitivity, and mechanical thrombectomy cost exerted comparably minimal influence over lifetime costs. DISCUSSION: We find considerable cost savings favoring the use of IONM under certain parameters corresponding to high-risk patients. This study will provide financial perspective to policymakers, clinicians, and patients alike on the appropriate use of IONM during cardiac surgery.

Optical Coherence Tomography in the Evaluation of Suspected Carotid Webs.

BACKGROUND: Carotid web (CaW) is a subtype of fibromuscular dysplasia that predominantly involves the intimal layer of the arterial wall and is commonly overlooked as a separate causative entity for recurrent strokes. CaW is defined as a shelf-like lesion at the carotid bulb, although different morphological features have been reported. Optical coherence tomography (OCT) has been described in the literature as a useful microscopic and cross-sectional tomographic imaging tool. This study aimed to evaluate the potential utility of OCT in characterizing the wall structure features of patients with suspected CaW. METHODS: Retrospective analysis of patients with suspected CaW who underwent digital subtraction angiography (DSA) coupled with OCT of the carotid bulb from 2018 to 2021 in a single comprehensive stroke center. RESULTS: Sixteen patients were included. The median age was 56 years (IQR 46-61) and 50% were women. OCT corroborated the diagnosis of CaW in 12/16 (75%) cases and ruled it out in 4/16 (25%) patients in whom atherosclerotic disease was demonstrated. Five of the 12 lesions demonstrated a thick fibrotic ridge consistent with CaW but also showed atherosclerotic changes in the vicinity of the carotid bulb (labeled as "CaW+"). In 4/16 (25%) patients, microthrombi adhered to the vessel wall were noted on OCT (inside the CaW pocket or just distal to the web), none of which were observed on CT angiography or DSA. CONCLUSIONS: OCT may have value as a complementary imaging tool in the investigation of patients with suspected CaW and atypical morphological features. Further studies are warranted.

Primary results from the CLEAR study of a novel stent retriever with drop zone technology.

BACKGROUND: Challenges to revascularization of large vessel occlusions (LVOs) persist. Current stent retrievers have limited effectiveness for removing organized thrombi. The NeVa device is a novel stent retriever designed to capture organized thrombi within the scaffold during retrieval. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the safety and effectiveness of revascularization of acute LVOs with the NeVa device. METHODS: Prospective, international, multicenter, single-arm, Investigational Device Exemption study to evaluate the performance of the NeVa device in recanalizing LVOs including internal carotid artery, M1/M2 middle cerebral artery, and vertebrobasilar arteries, within 8 hours of onset. Primary endpoint was rate of expanded Treatment in Cerebral Ischemia (eTICI) score 2b-3 within 3 NeVa passes, tested for non-inferiority against a performance goal of 72% with a -10% margin. Additional endpoints included first pass success and 90-day modified Rankin Scale (mRS) score 0-2. Primary composite safety endpoint was 90-day mortality and/or 24-hour symptomatic intracranial hemorrhage (sICH). RESULTS: From April 2021 to April 2022, 139 subjects were enrolled at 25 centers. Median National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) score was 16 (IQR 12-20). In the primary analysis population (n=107), eTICI 2b-3 within 3 NeVa passes occurred in 90.7% (97/107; non-inferiority P<0.0001; post hoc superiority P<0.0001). First pass eTICI 2b-3 was observed in 73.8% (79/107), with first pass eTICI 2b67-3 in 69.2% (74/107) and eTICI 2c-3 in 48.6% (52/107). Median number of passes was 1 (IQR 1-2). Final eTICI 2b-3 rate was 99.1% (106/107); final eTICI 2b67-3 rate was 91.6% (98/107); final eTICI 2c-3 rate was 72.9% (78/107). Good outcome (90-day mRS score 0-2) was seen in 65.1% (69/106). Mortality was 9.4% (13/138) with sICH in 5.0% (7/139). CONCLUSIONS: The NeVa device is highly effective and safe for revascularization of LVO strokes and demonstrates superior first pass success compared with a predicate performance goal. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT04514562.

Flow Diverters with Surface Modification in Patients with Intracranial Aneurysms: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

BACKGROUND: Flow diverters with surface modification (FDSM) are increasingly being used in the treatment of intracranial aneurysms (ANs). We aimed to evaluate the effectiveness and safety across different devices and antiplatelet therapies using a systematic review and meta-analysis. METHODS: A systematic review was performed to identify original studies of ≥10 patients with intracranial ANs treated with FDSM from database inception through August 2023. Primary effectiveness outcome was the rate of complete AN occlusion at follow-up ≥6 months. Safety outcomes included ischemic stroke, hemorrhage, and in-stent thrombosis, and were stratified by FDSM devices and antiplatelet therapies. Certainty of evidence was evaluated following the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations approach. RESULTS: Twenty-seven studies were included, yielding 2161 patients with 2373 ANs. A total of 70.5% of the ANs were located on the internal carotid artery (ICA). Total 10.3% were acutely ruptured. The complete AN occlusion rate was 72.3% at follow-up ≥6 months. Sensitivity analysis in the ICA AN cohort yielded comparable occlusion rates between Pipeline Flex Embolization Device-Shield (80.4%) and Phenox-hydrophilic polymer-coated (77.5%, P = 0.54), but a lower 66.2% rate for Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device-X (P = 0.02). The rate of in-stent thrombosis and stenosis tended to be higher in Phenox-hydrophilic polymer-coated (3.4%) and Flow Redirection Endoluminal Device-X (4.3%) versus Pipeline Flex Embolization Device-Shield (0.8%, P = 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: FDSM were safe with satisfactory effectiveness for intracranial ANs. More specific investigations are warranted to explore their performance in ANs beyond the ICA and optimal antiplatelet therapy.

Symptomatic Non-stenotic Carotid Disease in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source : Analysis of the ESCAPE-NA1 Trial.

PURPOSE: Non-stenotic (< 50%) carotid disease may play an important etiological role in ischemic stroke classified as embolic stroke of undetermined source (ESUS). We aimed to assess the prevalence of non-stenotic carotid disease and its association with ipsilateral ischemic stroke. METHODS: Data are from ESCAPE-NA1, a randomized controlled trial investigating the neuroprotectant nerinetide in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion (LVO). The degree of stenosis of the extracranial internal carotid artery (ICA) and high-risk plaque features were assessed on baseline computed tomography (CT) angiography. We evaluated the association of non-stenotic carotid disease and ipsilateral stroke by age-adjusted and sex-adjusted logistic regression and calculated the attributable risk of ipsilateral stroke caused by non-stenotic carotid disease. RESULTS: After excluding patients with non-assessable imaging, symptomatic > 50% carotid stenosis and extracranial dissection, 799/1105 (72.1%) patients enrolled in ESCAPE-NA1 remained for this analysis. Of these, 127 (15.9%) were classified as ESUS. Non-stenotic carotid disease occurred in 34/127 ESUS patients (26.8%) and was associated with the presence of ipsilateral ischemic stroke (odds ratio, OR 1.6, 95% confidence interval, CI 1.0-2.6, p = 0.049). The risk of ipsilateral ischemic stroke attributable to non-stenotic carotid disease in ESUS was estimated to be 19.7% (95% CI -5.7% to 39%), the population attributable risk was calculated as 4.3%. Imaging features such as plaque thickness, plaque irregularity or plaque ulceration were not different between non-stenotic carotids with vs. without ipsilateral stroke. CONCLUSION: Non-stenotic carotid disease frequently occurs in patients classified as ESUS and is associated with ipsilateral ischemic stroke. Our findings support the role of non-stenotic carotid disease as stroke etiology in ESUS, but further prospective research is needed to prove a causal relationship.

Predicting outcome in acute stroke with large vessel occlusion-application and validation of MR PREDICTS in the ESCAPE-NA1 population.

BACKGROUND: Predicting outcome after endovascular treatment for acute ischemic stroke is challenging. We aim to investigate differences between predicted and observed outcomes in patients with acute ischemic stroke treated with endovascular treatment and to evaluate the performance of a validated outcome prediction score. PATIENTS AND METHODS: MR PREDICTS is an outcome prediction tool based on a logistic regression model designed to predict the treatment benefit of endovascular treatment based on the MR CLEAN and HERMES populations. ESCAPE-NA1 is a randomized trial of nerinetide vs. placebo in patients with acute stroke and large vessel occlusion. We applied MR PREDICTS to patients in the control arm of ESCAPE-NA1. Model performance was assessed by calculating its discriminative ability and calibration. RESULTS: Overall, 556/1105 patients (50.3%) in the ESCAPE-NA1-trial were randomized to the control arm, 435/556 (78.2%) were treated within 6 h of symptom onset. Good outcome (modified Rankin scale 0-2) at 3 months was achieved in 275/435 patients (63.2%), the predicted probability of good outcome was 52.5%. Baseline characteristics were similar in the study and model derivation cohort except for age (ESCAPE-NA1: mean: 70 y vs. HERMES: 66 y), hypertension (72% vs. 57%), and collaterals (good collaterals, 15% vs. 44%). Compared to HERMES we observed higher rates of successful reperfusion (TICI 2b-3, ESCAPE-NA1: 87% vs. HERMES: 71%) and faster times from symptom onset to reperfusion (median: 201 min vs. 286 min). Model performance was good, indicated by a c-statistic of 0.76 (95%confidence interval: 0.71-0.81). CONCLUSION: Outcome-prediction using models created from HERMES data, based on information available in the emergency department underestimated the actual outcome in patients with acute ischemic stroke and large vessel occlusion receiving endovascular treatment despite overall good model performance, which might be explained by differences in quality of and time to reperfusion. These findings underline the importance of timely and successful reperfusion for functional outcomes in acute stroke patients.

Intra-arterial tenecteplase following endovascular therapy in patients with acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion: study protocol and rationale.

BACKGROUND: Recently, a randomized controlled trial showed a beneficial effect of intra-arterial thrombolysis following successful endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) in patients with acute ischemic stroke due to large vessel occlusion in the anterior circulation. Due to differences in response to thrombolytics in occlusion of the posterior circulation, the purpose of ATTENTION IA is to explore the adjunct benefit of intra-arterial thrombolysis after successful recanalization in patients presenting with large and medium vessel occlusion of the posterior circulation. METHODS: ATTENTION-IA is an investigator-initiated, multicenter, prospective, randomized clinical trial with open-label treatment and blinded endpoint assessment (PROBE). After achieving successful recanalization (expanded Thrombolysis In Cerebral Infarction (eTICI) 2b-3) of an occlusion of the vertebral, basilar, or posterior cerebral artery, patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive intra-arterial tenecteplase or standard of care. The primary effect parameter is a modified Rankin Score of 0-1 at day 90. RESULTS: The trial recently completed enrollment, and data collection/verification is ongoing. The final results will be made available on completion of enrollment and follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: ATTENTION-IA will provide definitive evidence for the efficacy and safety of adjunct intra-arterial tenecteplase after successful EVT in patients with an acute posterior circulation arterial occlusion stroke presenting within 24 hours of symptom onset. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05684172.

Large vessel occlusion prediction scale thresholds that are sensitive for DAWN Trial patients.

BACKGROUND: Large vessel occlusion (LVO) prediction scales are used to triage prehospital suspected stroke patients with a high probability of LVO stroke to endovascular therapy centers. The sensitivities of these scales in the 6-to-24-h time window are unknown. Higher scale score thresholds are typically less sensitive and more specific. Knowing the highest scale score thresholds that remain sensitive could inform threshold selection for clinical use. Sensitivities may also vary between left and right-sided LVOs. METHODS: LVO prediction scale scores were retrospectively calculated using the National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale (NIHSS) scores of patients enrolled in the DAWN Trial. All patients had last known well times between 6 and 24 h, NIHSS scores ≥ 10, intracranial internal carotid artery or proximal middle cerebral artery occlusions, and mismatches between their clinical severities and infarct core volumes. Scale thresholds with sensitivities ≥ 85% were identified, along with scores ≥ 5% more sensitive for left or right-sided LVOs. Specificities could not be calculated because all patients had LVOs. RESULTS: A total of 201 out of 206 patients had the required NIHSS subitem scores. CPSS = 3, C-STAT ≥ 2, FAST-ED ≥ 4, G-FAST ≥ 3, RACE ≥ 5, and SAVE ≥ 3 were the highest thresholds that were still 85% sensitive for DAWN Trial LVO stroke patients. RACE ≥ 5 was the only typically used score threshold more sensitive for right-sided LVOs, though similar small differences were seen for other scales at higher thresholds. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings likely represent the maximum sensitivities of the LVO prediction scales tested for ideal thrombectomy candidates in the 6-to-24-h time window because NIHSS scores were documented in hospitals during a clinical trial rather than in the prehospital setting. Patients with NIHSS scores < 10 or more distal LVOs would lower sensitivities further. Selecting even higher scale thresholds for LVO triage would lead to many missed LVO strokes.

Emergent use of ticagrelor during endovascular reperfusion in large arterial occlusions.

OBJECTIVE: Given many emerging indications for endovascular interventions in ischemic strokes, a safe and effective adjuvant antiplatelet regimen for acute revascularization has become a subject of interest. Ticagrelor is a direct oral P2Y12 inhibitor that may achieve rapid platelet suppression than standard oral therapies. We report our experience of Ticagrelor use in revascularization of acute large arterial steno-occlusive disease, describing procedural post-procedure thrombotic events, major hemorrhages, and other clinical outcomes. METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective case series of large steno-occlusive disease requiring endovascular reperfusion with emergent adjuvant Ticagrelor, defined as 30 min of the procedure from skin puncture to closure of the arteriotomy. Major outcomes investigated were thromboembolism in the target artery, and symptomatic intracranial or extracranial major hemorrhages. Additional analyses were performed with respect to timing of the administration and use of rescue GPIIb/IIIa inhibitors if any. RESULTS: 73 consecutive patients were identified, presenting with severe ischemic stroke (median NIHSS 16) of large artery origin. 67% required stent placement (45% cervical carotid, 22% intracranial artery), 9.5% angioplasty and 23% mechanical thrombectomy only. Two experienced symptomatic in-stent occlusion, and 7 experienced major hemorrhages (9.5%) including 3 fatal symptomatic intracranial hemorrhages (4.1%). Among 19 subjects (26%) who received pretreatment with Ticagrelor, there were fewer GPIIb/IIIa administration, angioplasty and stenting, without yielding benefit in functional outcome or mortality. GPIIb/IIIa was administered as rescue therapy in 45 subjects (62%), which was found associated with increased bleeding compared to patients receiving Ticagrelor only, in whom no bleeding complications were recorded (16% vs. 0%; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: We report our findings on Ticagrelor as an adjuvant antiplatelet therapy in ischemic stroke of large arterial origin requiring emergent revascularization. Effectiveness, safety, need for additional rescue treatment, and comparison to other commonly used oral antiplatelets should be investigated in future prospective studies.

Intracranial stenting versus aggressive medical therapy for symptomatic intracranial stenosis: A meta-analysis of multicenter randomized controlled trials and an expert assessment of the current data.

BACKGROUND: Intracranial atherosclerotic stenosis (ICAS) is associated with high risk of recurrent strokes despite best medical management (MM). We aimed to synthesize the evidence from randomized studies comparing intracranial stenting plus MM versus MM alone. METHODS: Comprehensive search of MEDLINE database was performed until May 2023. The data were extracted and pooled as risk ratio (RR) with 95% confidence interval (95% CI). RESULTS: We included three multicenter RCTs totaling 919 patients. As compared to MM alone, intracranial stenting was associated with statistically significant higher risks of any stroke or death (RR = 2.93, 95%CI [1.80-4.78], p < 0.0001), stroke in the same territory of qualifying artery (RR = 3.56, 95%CI [1.97-6.44], p < 0.0001), any ischemic stroke (RR = 2.22, 95%CI [1.27-3.87], p = 0.005), hemorrhagic stroke (RR = 13.49, 95%CI [2.59-70.15], p = 0.0002), and death (RR = 5.43, 95%CI [1.21-24.40], p = 0.003) within 30 days of randomization. There was a persistent lack of benefit and signals of harm at the last follow up within 1-3 years: any stroke or death (RR = 1.57, 95%CI [0.92-2.67], p = 0.1), stroke in the same territory of qualifying artery (RR = 1.84, 95%CI [0.97-3.50], p = 0.06), any ischemic stroke (RR = 1.56, 95%CI [1.11-2.20], p = 0.01), death (RR = 1.61, 95%CI [0.77-3.38], p = 0.2). The cumulative rate of stroke in the same territory of qualified artery with MM alone within the 1-3-year follow up was lower than expected, with only 47 out of the 450 (10.4%) MM alone patients suffering such events. CONCLUSION: The findings from this meta-analysis do not recommend stenting as a routine care option for the broader symptomatic ICAS patient population. The rates of recurrent strokes in ICAS patients managed with aggressive MM do not seem to be as high as anticipated. Additional multicenter RCTs including safer devices, larger sample sizes, and patients at higher risk of recurrent events are warranted.